<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Optimum rf impedance to present to transceiver output.</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/84290/optimum-rf-impedance-to-present-to-transceiver-output</link><description>I am tying to match the nRF52840 rf output to my 50 ohm 2.45GHz pcb antenna. What is the optimum rf impedance for best transmitter/receiver performance? The markings on the chip are N52840 QIAAC0 1908GK. 
 
 Thankyou, 
 Doug</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13 Non-Production</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 13:37:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/84290/optimum-rf-impedance-to-present-to-transceiver-output" /><item><title>RE: Optimum rf impedance to present to transceiver output.</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/354370?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 13:37:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9e1c9179-73f0-454a-b95f-2ab161244bb8</guid><dc:creator>user13081</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Doug,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I notice that you set the status of this case to &amp;quot;Open&amp;quot;, do you need any more assistance?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can copy some information from a previous case that asked about the output impedance of the ANT pin of the nRF52833 which has an identical radio to the nRF52840, but has a four component radio matching network instead of three:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1645536659849v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1645536689474v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The load impedance, seen into the matching network, should be close to 35 - j35 ohm. The impedance seen into the ANT pin doesn&amp;#39;t change too much from 8 dBm to 0 dBm mode. This is the impedance measured into the matching network from the antenna side:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1575472040810v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1575472065940v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want to design a matching network optimal for max 0 dBm output power, you can get away with just a shunt capacitor and a series inductor. Provided you ground the shunt capacitor like in the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.nordicsemi.com/-/media/Software-and-other-downloads/Reference-Layouts/nRF52833-xxAA-Reference-Layout-0_8.zip"&gt;reference layout&lt;/a&gt;. A 0.8 pF capacitor and 3.9 nH inductor is a good starting point. Measure the impedance seen into the matching network with the radio in TX mode and adjust for 50 ohm. (Note:&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;Usually when measuring into the matching network, towards the radio, when the radio is in TX mode you would see an impedance closer to ~70 ohm because this gives the best operating&amp;nbsp;conditions (less harmonics) from the PA.)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The additional components are needed to filter harmonics in 4 and 8 dBm mode.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason for the extra inductor in the nRF52833 matching network is to have more margins for the harmonics to the radio regulatory limits in 8 dBm mode.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both the -833 and -840 matching networks are ok in 8 dBm mode, it&amp;#39;s just that we wanted to attenuate the harmonics a bit more. If you only use 0 and 4 dBm, you can use the -840 matching network on both devices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards, Martin S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Optimum rf impedance to present to transceiver output.</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/350759?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:56:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:32ae23ab-e048-4747-91a6-3ebc8ee73b7a</guid><dc:creator>user13081</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Doug,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As mentioned we provide the service of tuning the radio- and antenna matching networks in-house, if you want to you can send two PCB&amp;#39;s to us and we can do it for you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We also have a&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nwp_017.pdf?cp=17_13"&gt;white paper&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;on antenna tuning using a VNA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s not just about adjusting the the output from the radio to the right impedance though, it&amp;#39;s also about subduing 2nd, 3rd and 4th harmonics so the product passes certification, we use a spectrum analyzer to make sure we get the harmonics sufficiently low.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example: C26 (in your case) with a value of 0.8 pF together with the trace that goes through VSS_PA creates a notch filter effect that ideally helps subdues 2nd and 3rd harmonics if the reference layout for the PCB is followed exactly.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user="DashRiprock"] The problem is how will I ever know if I have this right without doing radiated measurements?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;You can get it as close as you can by doing conducted measurements and adjusting the matching network components accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me know how I can be of further assistance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Martin S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Optimum rf impedance to present to transceiver output.</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/350758?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:49:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cb220f21-6326-4602-a6dc-ee66ca652345</guid><dc:creator>user108504</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Martin,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am going to first make adjustments to the pcb antenna geometry to get it to 50 ohms.&amp;nbsp; Here is the schematic (this was not done by me, I am trying to verify/improve it). I can provide trace widths and pcb stackup later.&amp;nbsp; The problem is how will I ever know if I have this right without doing radiated measurements?&amp;nbsp; I am an experienced rf design engineer with a Vector Network Analyzer, simulation tools, and the know-how to design my own matching circuit.&amp;nbsp; If I knew the PA output impedance I could design the match/filter and verify it with a VNA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1632404491334v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Optimum rf impedance to present to transceiver output.</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/350757?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:57:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:becb19e5-f998-4bfc-8bea-3bc108d868cc</guid><dc:creator>user13081</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Douglas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The optimum impedance for best transmitter/receiver performance is 50 ohms. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The components in the radio matching network are there to subdue harmonics and make sure that the signal in the transmission line is close to 50 ohms impedance. There isn&amp;#39;t a guarantee that the signal out from the ANT pin is 50 ohms impedance (it&amp;#39;s usually a bit above), and the radio matching network is there to adjust it. The same goes for the antenna matching network, it&amp;#39;s there to make sure that the signal sees as close as possible to a 50 ohm impedance into the antenna.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/1817.pastedimage1630500093588v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/8764.pastedimage1630502673339v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Having close to 50 ohm impedance for the entire RF path facilitates an optimal transfer of energy, and if there is a mismatch in impedance you get a loss in power and reduced performance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;We provide a service of schematic and layout review to help our customers get an ideal PCB layout as well as in house antenna measurement and tuning.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can share your schematic so I can see if you need to do any changes to the design (I have made the case private so no one else can see them), and when/if the PCB is ready you can send PCB&amp;#39;s to us and we can do measurements in-house to give you recommended component values for the matching networks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Best regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Martin S.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>