<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/88459/unexpectedly-high-rssi-samples</link><description>Hi, 
 I wonder if you can help with this query.. I&amp;#39;m using the nRF52811 in a design that uses a proprietary protocol. The system is currently using 8 channels, hopping and keying up every 4.17 ms and sending a short packet in 125k coded mode. I&amp;#39;m currently</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13 Non-Production</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:04:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/88459/unexpectedly-high-rssi-samples" /><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/371955?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:04:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e373786f-9f90-4d89-a6f5-7d9ab7747e26</guid><dc:creator>user79956</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for confirming that&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="emoticon" data-url="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/emoji/1f44d.svg" title="Thumbsup"&gt;&amp;#x1f44d;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/371910?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:55:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:de7387e0-00a5-4489-bdc6-0c2524bda620</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;IF is 1 MHz, and fLO is&amp;nbsp;at fRX - 1 MHz.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I meant to say adjacent channel, not co-channel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/371861?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:37:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2ac72d58-2f80-4d94-924f-14b7345e611b</guid><dc:creator>user79956</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the IF is 1 MHz then, with fLO 1 MHz below the wanted? That would also explain the high level I see at f+1 MHz, which must be the response to LO leakage. Is the IF given in the datasheet? I couldn&amp;#39;t see it. The figure for image rejection is a bit useless without knowing the IF, I think. Your comment about the co-channel rejection is a little confusing - co-channel is just that, an interferer on the same frequency as the wanted. It shouldn&amp;#39;t be affected by the image response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/371700?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 13:53:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6e5c0173-da42-430b-a255-bde1de85589d</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What you see at +2 MHz is the image frequency. This is at fRX - 2 MHz in 1 Mbps mode and fRF - 4 MHz in 2 Mbps mode. The reason you see it at +2 MHz is because fRX is moving and the carrier is static.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Co-channel rejection isn&amp;#39;t as good at the image frequency as it&amp;#39;s on the opposite side side of the carrier.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1654782814399v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ps_nrf52811/radio.html#unique_447008773"&gt;https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ps_nrf52811/radio.html#unique_447008773&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/371215?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:32:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9cbbce69-7bbf-4d2a-8e70-6d824beb025f</guid><dc:creator>user79956</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the reply,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep, I realised after I posted that the coded phy would still be 1 Mbps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the fact that I am seeing energy only ~30 dB down on the channel 2 MHz higher when I use an unmodulated calibrated source is still puzzling me. And it&amp;#39;s not symmetrical. I&amp;#39;ve checked the signal on a spectrum analyser and it is very clean and within 120 Hz of 2441 MHz. Another plot at -40 dBm:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/unmodulated-bench-source-at-neg40dBm-2441-MHz.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/370643?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 10:11:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:713e0f2c-1c1f-4abc-8038-91ee90016766</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember that coded phy is running with 1 MBps so the carrier is ~1 MHz wide. The RSSI detector will measure the energy in the channel but some energy from the adjacent channel will also we part of this. The unmodulated carrier doesn&amp;#39;t have a bandwidth so very little adjacent channel power.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/370436?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 11:59:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f15175cf-d5e7-4872-81bc-23ee1a5583eb</guid><dc:creator>user79956</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thinking about this a bit more, comparing the levels that I&amp;#39;m seeing with the Tx 1st and 2nd adjacent channel spec numbers is a mistake as I am not taking into account the receiver channel bandwidth. If the Rx bandwidth is around 1 MHz* then that explains high levels at 1 and 2 MHz offsets, even with the unmodulated bench source. But it doesn&amp;#39;t really explain the asymmetry on the plot obtained with the calibrated bench source. The 32MHz crystal on our board is 10ppm so I know it&amp;#39;s not off channel by much.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*What will the receiver channel bandwidth be if I have configured the radio in Ble_1Mbit mode ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/370270?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 14:27:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c42744fa-4e67-4b9b-a5b5-17a2636edcf9</guid><dc:creator>user79956</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I appreciate that the over-air symbol rate for 125 k coded is still 1 M/s but the 1st and 2nd adjacent levels still seem higher than the -25 dBc and -50 dBc given in the datasheet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Unexpectedly high RSSI samples</title><link>https://test-devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/370261?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 14:05:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bc837081-652e-4a2b-ad73-4121f453e2bb</guid><dc:creator>user79956</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Meant to add that the lower plot is with the signal generator output switched off but still connected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>