this is a deflector test
I would like to ask you for your opinion, although it is not directly Nordic related, but indirectly, it is. The following:
The customer ICP (Holten, The Netherlands) designed a system based around a Raytac BLE module, the MDBT50Q-1MV2. The customer is running the certification tests and is running in to problems with the end product. The radiated power is too high on one of the harmonic side channels, so the customer suspects the Raytac module (although, this one does have passed all certifications for CE, FCC, and more).
The ICP product is tested for FCC compliancy at Telefication (authorized test and certification company). The reason for this is that the MDBT50Q-1MV2 already does have an FCC ID. Because of that, a minimum test and measurement procedure can be executed to verify whether the ICP board is still compliant with the FCC rules or not.
Since the ICP end product failed the test, the customer took the Raytac development board to verify the emission of this one, and surprisingly this board shows the same behavior compared to the customer board. As well the Raytac evaluation board is fully certified. See the results in the document: Emission Development Board.